Well, I certainly decided to bite off a big chunk on a Sunday afternoon, didn’t I?  Merit pay for teachers has been a hot button issue for so long, and it is such a “tough one”.  It looks like it should work.  It really does.  When I first thought about it, it seemed like a great idea.  Why not pay people more for doing better work?  How could this not be part of the solution for education?  Not so fast…

I felt this way, that is, until I took a look at the evidence.  Until I talked to educators, and those who train educators – and most of them are NOT union members by the way.  In fact, only 15% of this nation’s teachers are union members!  So, certainly unions aren’t as much an indoctrinator of teachers as some think.   And, despite seeing a need for unions, I see huge flaws in the way they do business.  So I am not some indoctrinated kool-aid drinker either.  So let’s put that to bed.  This is a discussion on the merits only.  Here are my top reasons why merit pay is a bad idea.

1.  Merit Pay works well in certain situations where things are well within your control, and when working with other adults.  The range of disciplines in which merit pay can work include those where volume is the most important factor, and where one adult can convince another adult to do something through persuasion (sales).   In other words, where we are producing something (items or sales) that exists along a steady, linear scale.  But teaching is not one of these types of disciplines.   Children are not products, and development is definitely not linear.

So, already we are in a bad spot, but shall I go on?  Yes?  Ok.  Let’s talk evidence

2.  From the review, “The Paradox of Merit Pay in the Public Sector” by Kellough and Lu:  “Studies that have produced favorable results are, in fact, rare.”   I highly suggest reading this review.  I will also mention that I worked for five years in a high profile county government – in that agency, merit pay is viewed as a joke by almost all employees.  It is seen as biased, highly dependent on what supervisor one gets, and most think that it is impossible to have an objective measure because everyone’s job situation is so different.

3. The measures being used have little to do with the curriculum being taught or the actual results of that curriculum being taught.  This is a huge problem if you are going to institute a system of merit based pay.  The outcomes have to clearly match performance, which in turn clearly matches effort.  This is not even close to being the case currently in education.  Check this out, from Daniel Willingham, Ph.D. (University of Virginia)

For these reasons alone, merit pay is a horrible idea that has not and will not have a positive effect on teaching or education for out children.  So why do it?   The reason we want to do it is because the real solution is far too difficult.  The real solution – paying teachers well to attract talent, and then spending the time and money to train the hell out of that talent – then coupling that will well thought out curricula?  Then valuing education over the creation of large sums of wealth and status?  Those things are too hard.  Those things are only what other successful educational systems have done.